„She arrived at this astonishing conclusion by the following process of thought. It may be presented in the form of a syllogism.
All girls who are in love regard the beloved as a spotless, reproachless hero.
Maggie Deronais did not regard Laurie Baxter as a spotless, reproachless hero.
Ergo. Maggie Deronais was not in love with Laurie Baxter.“
(Robert Hugh Benson, The Necromancers, 1909)
Wir merken uns: Nur wenn Obersatz und Untersatz (= 1. und 2. Prämisse) vollkommen stimmen, kommt auch die richtige Konklusion heraus.
(Zur weiteren Info gerne hier.)